Description

In this week's episode, the team discussed the retrospective application of laws concerning Brendan Abbott's escape charge and additional sentencing, noting that generally, laws don't apply retrospectively unless explicitly stated. Tony inquired about the formula for sentencing, and it was explained that the Sentencing Act outlines maximum penalties, with judges determining the appropriate sentence based on various factors and plea in mitigation. Sean raised concerns about a solar battery quote where the company increased the price due to changes in government rebates after a contract was signed, with the advice focusing on contract terms and unfair contract legislation. Crystal's message highlighted the severe and lasting impact of armed robbery on victims. Agnes questioned who is responsible for ambulance fees when a call is made for someone not in a total emergency, with the response clarifying that the recipient of treatment is responsible. Finally, a listener inquired about a lawyer increasing their fees mid-proceeding, with the advice stressing the need for clear cost agreements and client consent for fee changes.

Topics Discussed:

Retrospective application of laws

Sentencing formula for crimes

Solar battery quote issues

Impact of armed robbery

Ambulance fee responsibility

Lawyer increasing fees mid proceeding

Free entry for kids debate